Lobbying and concessions: Comparing Nash to Stackelberg games

Gil S. Epstein, Carsten Hefeker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We analyze how the standard results in lobbying theory change when one side has a second instrument at its disposal. We look at the effect concessions by one side have on the outcome in a Nash and a Stackelberg game.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-181
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Choice
Volume109
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lobbying and concessions: Comparing Nash to Stackelberg games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this