List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes

Original language	American English
Journal	submitted
State	Published - 2008

Other files and links

• link

Cite this

• APA
• Author
• BIBTEX
• Harvard
• Standard
• RIS
• Vancouver

Kaufman, T., & Lovett, S. (2008). List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes. submitted.

Kaufman, T. ; Lovett, Shachar. / List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes. In: submitted. 2008.

@article{8329bb9dca76463e86f70b7464c2e1ad,

title = "List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes",

author = "T. Kaufman and Shachar Lovett",

year = "2008",

language = "American English",

journal = "submitted",

}

Kaufman, T & Lovett, S 2008, 'List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes', submitted.

List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes. / Kaufman, T.; Lovett, Shachar.
In: submitted, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes

AU - Kaufman, T.

AU - Lovett, Shachar

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

UR - https://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?q=List+Size+vs.+Decoding+Radius+for+Reed-Muller+Codes++%2C+Tali+Kaufman&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

M3 - Article

JO - submitted

JF - submitted

ER -

Kaufman T, Lovett S. List size vs. decoding radius for Reed–Muller codes. submitted. 2008.