Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Left Atrial Decompression Pump for Severe Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Theoretical and Clinical Considerations

  • Daniel Burkhoff
  • , Mathew S. Maurer
  • , Susan M. Joseph
  • , Joseph G. Rogers
  • , Edo Y. Birati
  • , J. Eduardo Rame
  • , Sanjiv J. Shah
  • Medtronic, Inc.
  • Columbia University
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Duke University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Northwestern University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to provide insight into the potential for left atrium (LA) to aortic mechanical circulatory support as a treatment for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Background: Although HFpEF arises from different etiologies, 1hallmark of all forms of this syndrome is a small or minimally-dilated left ventricle (LV). Consequently, the use of traditional mechanical circulatory support in end-stage patients has been difficult. In contrast, HFpEF is also characterized by a large LA. Methods: Hemodynamic characteristics of 4 distinct HFpEF phenotypes were characterized from the published data: 1)hypertrophic cardiomyopathies; 2) infiltrative diseases; 3) nonhypertrophic HFpEF; and 4) HFpEF with common cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g., hypertension). Employing a previously-described cardiovascular simulation, the effects ofa low-flow, micropump-based LA decompression device were modeled. The effect of sourcing blood from the LV versus the LA was compared. Results: For all HFpEF phenotypes, mechanical circulatory support significantly increased cardiac output, provided a mild increase in blood pressure, and markedly reduced pulmonary and LA pressures. LV sourcing of blood reduced LV end-systolic volume into a range likely to induce suction. With LA sourcing, however, LV end-systolic volume increased compared with baseline. Due to pre-existing LA enlargement, LA volumes remained sufficiently elevated, thus minimizing the risk of suction. Conclusions: This theoretical analysis suggests that a strategy involving pumping blood from the LA to the arterial system may provide a viable option for end-stage HFpEF. Special considerations apply to each of the 4 types of HFpEFphenotypes described. Finally, an HFpEF-specific clinical profile scoring system (such as that of INTERMACS [Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support]) would aid in the selection of patients with theappropriate risk-benefit ratio for implantation of an active pump.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-282
Number of pages8
JournalJACC: Heart Failure
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Funding

Dr. Burkhoff is an employee of HeartWare International; is a consultant to DC Devices; and receives speaking honoraria from Abiomed. Dr. Birati has received training and research grants from Thoratec Corporation and HeartWare Inc. Dr. Rame has served as a primary investigator for Thoratec Corporation and HeartWare Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Funders
Thoratec Corporation
HeartWare Inc.

    Keywords

    • CO
    • HCM
    • HFpEF
    • HFrEF
    • HTN
    • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    • LA
    • LV
    • LVAD
    • MCS
    • Mechanical circulatory support
    • NYHA
    • PCWP
    • RCM
    • VAD

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Left Atrial Decompression Pump for Severe Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Theoretical and Clinical Considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this