Learning What is Essential: Relative and Absolute Changes in Children's Beliefs about the Heritability of Ethnicity

Gil Diesendruck, Dana Birnbaum, Inas Deeb, Gili Segall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

There are conflicting findings regarding the development of essentialist beliefs about social categories. The present studies address these findings by differentiating between the developments of the relative versus absolute essentialist status of categories. Participants were Israeli Secular Jewish and Muslim Arab kindergarteners, second graders, and sixth graders. Study 1 asked children which among alternative properties of a parent was most likely to transfer to a child. Findings showed that while kindergarteners did not systematically discriminate among properties, second and sixth graders privileged ethnicity. Study 2 asked children whether membership in various social categories was biologically or environmentally determined. Findings showed that kindergarteners and second graders, but not sixth graders, believed ethnicity to be biologically inherited. These results are discussed vis-à-vis different theories about the origins of social essentialism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)546-560
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Cognition and Development
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by Grant No. 621/05 from the Israel Science Foundation and a Rector’s Grant to Gil Diesendruck.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning What is Essential: Relative and Absolute Changes in Children's Beliefs about the Heritability of Ethnicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this