Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Voice is an important way that members contribute to effective team functioning. And yet, the existing literature provides divergent guidance as to how leaders can promote member voice in action teams-a dynamic team context where eliciting voice may be difficult, due to different task demands encountered in the preparation and action phases of task performance, among members who may have little history of working together. Drawing on the employee voice and team leadership literatures, we focus on three leader behaviors-directing, coaching, and supporting-and employ a functional leadership perspective to assess whether certain leader behaviors enhance voice in one phase of the performance episode versus the other. We also assess whether these leadership-voice relationships are further contingent on team members' prior familiarity with one another. Observation and survey data from 105 surgical team episodes revealed that leader directing promoted voice in both the preparation and action phases. Coaching also facilitated voice in both phases, especially in the action phase for more familiar teams. Surprisingly, supporting did not enhance voice in either phase, and in fact exhibited negative effects on voice in the preparation phase of more familiar teams. Theoretical and practical implications around how leaders can elicit voice in action teams are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-110
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Psychological Association.

Keywords

  • Action teams
  • Leadership
  • Voice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this