TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent structure of cognition in schizophrenia
T2 - A confirmatory factor analysis of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)
AU - McCleery, A.
AU - Green, M. F.
AU - Hellemann, G. S.
AU - Baade, L. E.
AU - Gold, J. M.
AU - Keefe, R. S.E.
AU - Kern, R. S.
AU - Mesholam-Gately, R. I.
AU - Seidman, L. J.
AU - Subotnik, K. L.
AU - Ventura, J.
AU - Nuechterlein, K. H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2015.
PY - 2015/9/5
Y1 - 2015/9/5
N2 - Background The number of separable cognitive dimensions in schizophrenia has been debated. Guided by the extant factor analytic literature, the NIMH Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative selected seven cognitive domains relevant to treatment studies in schizophrenia: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. These domains are assessed in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The aim of this study was to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the beta battery of the MCCB to compare the fit of the MATRICS consensus seven-domain model to other models in the current literature on cognition in schizophrenia. Method Using data from 281 schizophrenia outpatients, we compared the seven correlated factors model with alternative models. Specifically, we compared the 7-factor model to (a) a single-factor model, (b) a three correlated factors model including speed of processing, working memory, and general cognition, and (c) a hierarchical model in which seven first-order factors loaded onto a second-order general cognitive factor. Results Multiple fit indices indicated the seven correlated factors model was the best fit for the data and provided significant improvement in model fit beyond the comparison models. Conclusions These results support the assessment of these seven cognitive dimensions in clinical trials of interventions to improve cognition in schizophrenia. Because these cognitive factors are separable to some degree, it is plausible that specific interventions may have differential effects on the domains.
AB - Background The number of separable cognitive dimensions in schizophrenia has been debated. Guided by the extant factor analytic literature, the NIMH Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative selected seven cognitive domains relevant to treatment studies in schizophrenia: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. These domains are assessed in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The aim of this study was to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the beta battery of the MCCB to compare the fit of the MATRICS consensus seven-domain model to other models in the current literature on cognition in schizophrenia. Method Using data from 281 schizophrenia outpatients, we compared the seven correlated factors model with alternative models. Specifically, we compared the 7-factor model to (a) a single-factor model, (b) a three correlated factors model including speed of processing, working memory, and general cognition, and (c) a hierarchical model in which seven first-order factors loaded onto a second-order general cognitive factor. Results Multiple fit indices indicated the seven correlated factors model was the best fit for the data and provided significant improvement in model fit beyond the comparison models. Conclusions These results support the assessment of these seven cognitive dimensions in clinical trials of interventions to improve cognition in schizophrenia. Because these cognitive factors are separable to some degree, it is plausible that specific interventions may have differential effects on the domains.
KW - Confirmatory factor analysis
KW - MCCB
KW - neurocognition
KW - schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938738355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0033291715000641
DO - 10.1017/S0033291715000641
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25916421
AN - SCOPUS:84938738355
SN - 0033-2917
VL - 45
SP - 2657
EP - 2666
JO - Psychological Medicine
JF - Psychological Medicine
IS - 12
ER -