Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology

András Hoznek, Ran Katz, Matthew Gettman, Laurent Salomon, Patrick Antiphon, Alexandre de la Taille, René Yiou, Dominique Chopin, Clément Claude Abbou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

The most important change in urology during the past decade was the development of minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy. However, the main drawback of laparoscopy is a steep learning curve, which results from the significant changes in the surgical environment. Although laparoscopy can provide important advantages for the patient, including decreased length of hospitalization, decreased analgesic requirement, and a shortened postoperative convalescence, one concern has been whether laparoscopic techniques should be learned solely in the operating room. For example, sports, music, and aviation are practiced before an actual performance is ever undertaken. In this review, the advantages and limitations of all available training modalities in minimally invasive surgery are described. Testing basic laparoscopic skills on inanimate models, becoming familiar with the principles of dissection and hemostasis on living animals, and studying surgical anatomy on cadavers should be considered as indispensable and complementary elements for laparoscopic training in the future. In addition, telementoring with the help of modern image processing and virtual reality eventually may become the basis of tomorrow’s surgical instruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-137
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent Urology Reports
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2003

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2003, Current Science Inc.

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic Instrument
  • Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
  • Laparoscopic Skill
  • Radical Prostatectomy
  • Virtual Reality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this