Language policy in French colonies and after independence

Bernard Spolsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

French colonies were created for the benefit not of the indigenous conquered peoples but of the home country. Their borders were set for political convenience and produced a jumble of ethnicities, languages, and cultures. Exploitation came first, and there was generally no attempt to find a workable educational solution to the local diversity. During French rule, a small elite was “assimilated,” educated in French and convinced of its value. Local languages were stigmatized and banned for school use, reducing their status even in the eyes of their speakers. After independence, the French-speaking elite replaced the colonial rulers, applying much the same language policy or in a few cases attempting to establish hegemony for a local variety. Creoles too were stigmatized. However, centralized language policy failed to change widespread traditional language practices: it was not just the pressure of other interest groups, but even more the effects of economic, demographic and political pressures that hindered producing a French-speaking population. Thus, it is not just the competition of various levels of language management, but rather the political and economic weakness that prevents the solution of the language problems first recognized half a century ago.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-315
Number of pages85
JournalCurrent Issues in Language Planning
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jul 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Corruption
  • elite closure
  • ethnic conflict
  • war

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Language policy in French colonies and after independence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this