Abstract
The campaign discourses of Jean-Luc Mélenchon remarkably illustrate Christian Plantin’s theorization of the argumentation of emotions. Reason and passion are here closely entangled. Mélenchon’s target is either to “terrify/intimidate” or to “terrorize/scare” his audiences. Appealing to fear does not appear here as an irrational strategy, it activates on the contrary a specific, full-fledged regime of rationality. We thus show that the Right is not alone in employing arguments which appeal to fear: the candidate of the France insoumise party condemns the instrumentalization of fear by the Right and the institutions of the Fifth Republic, but makes extensive use of the strategy in order to promote a left-wing ideology. Mélenchon’s argumentation is anchored in a humanistic universalism that gives priority to rational reasoning and debate, but simultaneously uses appeals to fear addressed to future voters and threats targeting his adversaries more or less explicitly. This contribution analyses the way these paradoxes manifest themselves linguistically.
Translated title of the contribution | Does the Left use fear appeal arguments? A study of Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s speeches during the 2017 presidential campaign |
---|---|
Original language | French |
Pages (from-to) | 15-32 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Studii de Lingvistica |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 1 |
State | Published - 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Editura Universitatii din Oradea. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Appeal to fear
- Argument from consequences
- Emotion in argument
- Reason and passion
- Slippery slope argument
- Threat tactics