Klein et al. Reply

In our Letter [1] we demonstrated that the critical resistivity of SrRuO3 disagrees strongly with the conventional theory [2]. Our demonstration was based on an analysis previously used to show the applicability of the conventional theory to other ferromagnetic metals such as iron [3] and nickel [4]. In the preceding Comment [5] Roussev and Millis (RM) show that dr(dT) of SrRuO3 is consistent with the conventional theory provided several assumptions apply and a different analysis is used. In our response we reject the interpretation of RM and focus on two points which we find most questionable in their analysis: the choice of the regular term St and the choice of the critical temperature Tc.