Jordan’s Path to Stability: The Secrets of State Survival

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

During the 1950s and 1960s, many observers believed that the Arab monarchies would eventually collapse, while republican regimes, particularly those led by military officers, would thrive. The reality turned out to be quite the opposite and thus far none, of the Arab monarchy regimes have ceased to exist. The common explanation for the survival of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) oil monarchies is their huge oil and gas rental revenues. However, this does not apply to the two poorer non-oil Arab monarchies—Jordan and Morocco. What, then, is the secret to their survival? The aim of this paper is to examine this crucial question regarding the poorest Arab Monarchy—Jordan. The main argument is that although Jordan’s Hashemite regime is categorized as an ‘authoritarian regime’, from its outset in the early 1920s, it functioned as a ‘soft authoritarian regime’, which has enabled his its survival thus far.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-289
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Hashemite regime
  • King Abdullah
  • King Hussein
  • political liberalization
  • soft authoritarian

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Jordan’s Path to Stability: The Secrets of State Survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this