Is the Use of Interpretations Associated With Treatment Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Answer

Sigal Zilcha-Mano; John R. Keefe; Hadar Fisher; Tohar Dolev-Amit; Nirit Veler-Poleg; Jacques P. Barber

doi:10.1037/cps0000158

Is the Use of Interpretations Associated With Treatment Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Answer

Sigal Zilcha-Mano, John R. Keefe, Hadar Fisher, Tohar Dolev-Amit, Nirit Veler-Poleg, Jacques P. Barber

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Interpretation is the doyen of therapeutic techniques and has received some of the greatest theoretical and clinical attention. Nevertheless, to date, no meta-analysis has examined its effect on psychotherapy outcome. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the association between interpretations and psychotherapy outcome. The meta-analysis was preregistered in PROSPERO. From 13,195 initially identified abstracts, we extracted 16 independent effect sizes from a total of 897 patients. Findings suggest a medium effect size (r = −.23, p =.002), indicating that the use of interpretations is associated with better outcome. This association remains consistent across types of interpretation measures, assessor perspectives, study quality, and number of sessions. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-13
Number of pages	13
Journal	Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume	31
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000158
State	Published - 15 Jun 2023
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Psychological Association

Funding

The work was partially supported by a grant from the American Psychoanalytic Association. This work was also supported by grants from the Israeli Science Foundation (Grant 186/15; 395/19).

Funders	Funder number
American Psychoanalytic Association
Israel Science Foundation	395/19, 186/15

Keywords

interpretations
meta-analysis
psychodynamic treatment
transference

Access to Document

10.1037/cps0000158

Cite this

@article{666350915a5a4daa8db40b40491eee01,

title = "Is the Use of Interpretations Associated With Treatment Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Answer",

abstract = "Interpretation is the doyen of therapeutic techniques and has received some of the greatest theoretical and clinical attention. Nevertheless, to date, no meta-analysis has examined its effect on psychotherapy outcome. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the association between interpretations and psychotherapy outcome. The meta-analysis was preregistered in PROSPERO. From 13,195 initially identified abstracts, we extracted 16 independent effect sizes from a total of 897 patients. Findings suggest a medium effect size (r = −.23, p =.002), indicating that the use of interpretations is associated with better outcome. This association remains consistent across types of interpretation measures, assessor perspectives, study quality, and number of sessions. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.",

keywords = "interpretations, meta-analysis, psychodynamic treatment, transference",

author = "Sigal Zilcha-Mano and Keefe, {John R.} and Hadar Fisher and Tohar Dolev-Amit and Nirit Veler-Poleg and Barber, {Jacques P.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 American Psychological Association",

year = "2023",

month = jun,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1037/cps0000158",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "31",

pages = "1--13",

journal = "Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice",

issn = "0969-5893",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the Use of Interpretations Associated With Treatment Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Answer

AU - Zilcha-Mano, Sigal

AU - Keefe, John R.

AU - Fisher, Hadar

AU - Dolev-Amit, Tohar

AU - Veler-Poleg, Nirit

AU - Barber, Jacques P.

PY - 2023/6/15

Y1 - 2023/6/15

N2 - Interpretation is the doyen of therapeutic techniques and has received some of the greatest theoretical and clinical attention. Nevertheless, to date, no meta-analysis has examined its effect on psychotherapy outcome. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the association between interpretations and psychotherapy outcome. The meta-analysis was preregistered in PROSPERO. From 13,195 initially identified abstracts, we extracted 16 independent effect sizes from a total of 897 patients. Findings suggest a medium effect size (r = −.23, p =.002), indicating that the use of interpretations is associated with better outcome. This association remains consistent across types of interpretation measures, assessor perspectives, study quality, and number of sessions. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.

AB - Interpretation is the doyen of therapeutic techniques and has received some of the greatest theoretical and clinical attention. Nevertheless, to date, no meta-analysis has examined its effect on psychotherapy outcome. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the association between interpretations and psychotherapy outcome. The meta-analysis was preregistered in PROSPERO. From 13,195 initially identified abstracts, we extracted 16 independent effect sizes from a total of 897 patients. Findings suggest a medium effect size (r = −.23, p =.002), indicating that the use of interpretations is associated with better outcome. This association remains consistent across types of interpretation measures, assessor perspectives, study quality, and number of sessions. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.

KW - interpretations

KW - meta-analysis

KW - psychodynamic treatment

KW - transference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169451830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/cps0000158

DO - 10.1037/cps0000158

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:85169451830

SN - 0969-5893

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

JF - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

IS - 1

ER -

Is the Use of Interpretations Associated With Treatment Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Answer

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this