Is it True That the Normal Valence-Length Correlation Is Irrelevant for Metal-Metal Bonds?

Vijay Singh, Mudit Dixit, Monica Kosa, Dan Thomas Major, Elena Levi, Doron Aurbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The most intriguing feature of metal-metal bonds in inorganic compounds is an apparent lack of correlation between the bond order and the bond length. In this study, we combine a variety of literature data obtained by quantum chemistry and our results based on the empirical bond valence model (BVM), to confirm for the first time the existence of a normal exponential correlation between the effective bond order (EBO) and the length of the metal-metal bonds. The difference between the EBO and the formal bond order is attributed to steric conflict between the (TM)n cluster (TM=transition metal) and its environment. This conflict, affected mainly by structural type, should cause high lattice strains, but electron redistribution around TM atoms, evident from the BVM calculations, results in a full or partial strain relaxation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5269-5276
Number of pages8
JournalChemistry - A European Journal
Volume22
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Apr 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords

  • bond length
  • bond order
  • bond strains
  • cluster compounds
  • computational chemistry
  • metal-metal bonds

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it True That the Normal Valence-Length Correlation Is Irrelevant for Metal-Metal Bonds?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this