Is Compliance the Name of the Effectiveness Game? Goal-Shifting and the Dynamics of Judicial Effectiveness at the WTO

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In line with current research on the effectiveness of international law and institutions, much of the literature on the effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement system (DSS) has settled on compliance as its primary effectiveness benchmark. This article challenges this trend. It argues that common models gauging the DSS effectiveness through the narrow lens of compliance disregard many other institutional goals pursued by the system, and the conflicts latent among them. Furthermore, existing models are also static in nature - predicated on problematic assumptions regarding the constant supremacy of the DSS compliance objective - what leads them to overlook important shifts amidst the multiple and conflicting goals of the DSS that take place over time and across disputes. Building on the goal-based approach developed in the social sciences, the article introduces a multidimensional framework for analyzing the DSS effectiveness, using the multiple, conflicting and shifting goals set for the system by WTO Members as key effectiveness benchmarks. The article then turns to closely examine the novel concept of 'goal-shifting' - essential for effectiveness assessment - and through interview-based analysis of different categories of WTO disputes shows how the DSS goals change with time and context, as a consequence of the changing modalities in which the system operates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-701
Number of pages31
JournalWorld Trade Review
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2016 Shlomo Agon.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Compliance the Name of the Effectiveness Game? Goal-Shifting and the Dynamics of Judicial Effectiveness at the WTO'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this