Abstract
We examined the dynamics through which temporary motor cues of approach or avoidance directed to an outgroup member affect attitudes of majority members toward the minority outgroup. In Study 1 participants activated and maintained either arm flexion or arm extension, while facing a picture of an outgroup person wearing religious trappings. Thereafter, they filled a questionnaire which measured outgroup prejudice. Study 2 replicated this procedure while including a control condition of the arm, and measured intergroup anxiety in addition to prejudice. In the first study outgroup prejudice was significantly higher following arm extension in comparison with arm flexion. The second study revealed that the source of the arm activation effect was due to arm extension increasing prejudice rather than arm flexion reducing it. Moreover, a mediation effect was found: Arm extension (vs. control) increased intergroup anxiety, which in turn was related to higher prejudice toward the outgroup. The results reveal embodiment effects by which temporary motor cues are related to visual religious cues leading to subsequent bias toward the outgroup. Multimodal representation accounts and theories explaining the psychological processes involved in perceiving threat-cues in intergroup relations are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 417-429 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 American Psychological Association
Keywords
- Approach and avoidance
- Arm flexion and extension
- Embodiment
- Intergroup anxiety
- Prejudice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is an Outgroup Welcome With Open Arms? Approach and Avoidance Motor Activations and Outgroup Prejudice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver