Intra‐uterine insemination with prepared sperm vs. unprepared first split ejaculates. A randomized study

M. Goldenberg, J. Rabinovici, D. Bider, B. Lunenfeld, J. Blankstein, R. Weissenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Summary. In this randomized prospective study, we determined the conception rate following intra‐uterine insemination with washed and prepared sperm, or with the first portion of a split ejaculate, in couples with longstanding male (n = 27, 70 treatment cycles) or cervical infertility (n = 14, 29 treatment cycles). Folliculogenesis and ovulation were induced by human menopausal gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin. Significantly more couples conceived in the male infertility group following intra‐uterine insemination with washed sperm, than after intrauterine insemination with split ejaculate (9 vs. 2; P<0.05), while no difference in pregnancy rate (2 vs. 2) was found by the two intra‐uterine insemination methods in the cervical infertility group. 1992 Blackwell Verlag GmbH

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-140
Number of pages6
JournalAndrologia
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Intrauterine insemination
  • sperm.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intra‐uterine insemination with prepared sperm vs. unprepared first split ejaculates. A randomized study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this