Abstract
Late onset intrauterine growth restriction is a common form of growth restriction, mainly caused by placenta-vascular insufficiency. Whether the intrauterine or extrauterine environment offers a better long-term outcome for the growth-restricted fetus remains unclear. We compared the risk factors and long-term outcomes of late onset growth-restricted neonates delivered between 31-36 weeks of gestation vs those delivered at term. This prospective cohort study included 114 preterm and 193 term born growth-restricted neonates. They underwent a neurobehavioral examination (neonatal period), a neurodevelopmental assessment and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (age 2 years), and neuromotor assessment and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (age 6 years). Growth-restricted neonates born prematurely exhibited a significantly higher incidence of maternal hypertension, a maternal history of abortions and stillbirths, increased intrapartum and postnatal complication rates, and abnormal neonatal neurobehavioral scores than expected. Both preterm and term born growth-restricted groups, however, exhibited comparable long-term neurodevelopmental and cognitive outcomes at ages 2 and 6 years. Although prematurely born neonates undergo an earlier growth restriction process and exhibit a higher perinatal risk factor profile, their long-term outcomes are comparable to those of growth-restricted neonates born at term.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 122-130 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Pediatric Neurology |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2011 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank Esther Eshkol and Shaina Henigman for editorial assistance, and the children and families for participating in this study. This study was supported by the Gulton Foundation (New York, NY). H.B. is supported by the Tel Aviv Sourasky Research Fund .
Funding
We thank Esther Eshkol and Shaina Henigman for editorial assistance, and the children and families for participating in this study. This study was supported by the Gulton Foundation (New York, NY). H.B. is supported by the Tel Aviv Sourasky Research Fund .
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Gulton Foundation | |
Tel Aviv Sourasky Research Fund |