Interspecific relationships in Pistacia based on RAPD fingerprinting

Salih Kafkas, Rafael Perl-Treves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among nine species in the genus Pistacia were studied by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. The following species were included: P. atlantica, P. terebinthus, P. eurycarpa, P. vera, P. integerrima, P. mexicana, P. palaestina, P. lentiscus, and P. khinjuk. Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissue and RAPD analysis was performed using 20 primers. A total of 242 fragments were generated and 228 bands were polymorphic at the inter-specific level. Subjecting these data to phylogenetic analysis yielded a shortest cladogram that is 338 steps long, featuring two main groups. P. vera, P. khinjuk, P. eurycarpa, P. atlantica, and P. integerrima were included in one group, while P. terebinthus, P. palaestina, P. mexicana, and P. lentiscus formed the second group. The first group included species with single-trunked and big trees, whereas the species included in the second group mostly grow as shrubs or small trees. The cladogram showed that the closest pairs of species were P. terebinthus and P. palaestina, P. eurycarpa and P. atlantica, P. vera and P. khinjuk, and P. mexicana and P. lentiscus. We suggest that P. palaestina is in fact a variety of P. terebinthus in view of the small genetic distance between them. This study also showed that P. eurycarpa (syn. P. atlantica var. kurdica) is a distinct species from P. atlantica, rather than a variety within the same species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-171
Number of pages4
JournalHortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fingerprinting
  • Phylogeny
  • Pistacia (Anacardiaceae)
  • RAPD
  • Taxonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interspecific relationships in Pistacia based on RAPD fingerprinting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this