Abstract
The authors examined the hypothesis that people forecast a longer duration of uniquely human secondary emotions for their in-group than for an out-group. The authors conducted a field experiment in the setting of the European soccer championship. They asked Belgian participants to forecast the intensity with which their in-group Belgian fans or the out-group Turkish fans would experience various primary and secondary emotions in response to their team’s victory or loss immediately after the Turkey-Belgium match and three days later. The results support the hypothesis. Moreover, and as the authors expected, they found no differences in the participants’ forecasts of primary emotions. The authors discussed the implications of these findings for intergroup relations in general and for soccer fans’ behavior in particular.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 117-126 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Social Psychology |
Volume | 145 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Apr 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported by Grant ARC 96/01.198 of the Communauté française de Belgique.
Funding
This research was supported by Grant ARC 96/01.198 of the Communauté française de Belgique.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Communauté française de Belgique |
Keywords
- Affective forecasting
- Infrahumanization
- Intergroup bias