Inter-ELM evolution of the edge current density in JET-ILW type i ELMy H-mode plasmas

JET Contributors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Recent studies (Maggi et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 113031; Maggi et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 116012) have shown that on JET with the Be/W ITER-like wall (JET-ILW) in high β discharges with high D2 gas rates, the inter-ELM temperature pedestal growth is saturated half way through the ELM cycle, leading to plasmas with reduced confinement, and that the linear MHD stability of these pedestals is inconsistent with the peeling-ballooning paradigm (Snyder et al 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 2037-43; Wilson et al 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 1277-86). In this paper, the inter-ELM evolution of the edge current density is investigated in a wide range of type I ELMy H-modes on JET-ILW. It is found that in discharges at a low gas rate, the peak edge bootstrap current continuously increases until the ELM crashes, while it saturates during the ELM cycle at high gas rates. The effect of current diffusion on the build-up of the edge current inter-ELM is assessed by simulating the Ohmic current contribution with the JETTO transport code. The simulations indicate that current diffusion contributes little to the time evolution of the total edge current in the second half of the ELM cycle and the total current is dominated by the bootstrap current. Therefore, current diffusion does not explain why JET-ILW type I ELMy pedestals at a high gas rate and high β N are found to be stable to peeling-ballooning modes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number085003
JournalPlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Issue number8
StatePublished - 13 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 York Plasma Institute.


  • ELMs
  • H-mode
  • bootstrap current
  • current diffusion
  • edge current
  • pedestal


Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-ELM evolution of the edge current density in JET-ILW type i ELMy H-mode plasmas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this