Infinitesimal analysis without the Axiom of Choice

Karel Hrbacek, Mikhail G. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is often claimed that analysis with infinitesimals requires more substantial use of the Axiom of Choice than traditional elementary analysis. The claim is based on the observation that the hyperreals entail the existence of nonprincipal ultrafilters over N, a strong version of the Axiom of Choice, while the real numbers can be constructed in ZF. The axiomatic approach to nonstandard methods refutes this objection. We formulate a theory SPOT in the st-∈-language which suffices to carry out infinitesimal arguments, and prove that SPOT is a conservative extension of ZF. Thus the methods of Calculus with infinitesimals are just as effective as those of traditional Calculus. The conclusion extends to large parts of ordinary mathematics and beyond. We also develop a stronger axiomatic system SCOT, conservative over ZF+ADC, which is suitable for handling such features as an infinitesimal approach to the Lebesgue measure. Proofs of the conservativity results combine and extend the methods of forcing developed by Enayat and Spector.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102959
JournalAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic
Volume172
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Axiom of choice
  • Extended ultrapower
  • Forcing
  • Nonstandard analysis
  • Ultrafilter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Infinitesimal analysis without the Axiom of Choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this