Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Increased instability of human CTG repeat tracts on yeast artificial chromosomes during gametogenesis

  • Haim Cohen
  • , Dorothy D. Sears
  • , Drora Zenvirth
  • , Philip Hieter
  • , Giora Simchen
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Expansion of trinucleotide repeat tracts has been shown to be associated with numerous human diseases. The mechanism and timing of the expansion events are poorly understood, however, we show that CTG repeats, associated with the human DMPK gene and implanted in two homologous yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs), are very unstable. The instability is 6 to 10 times more pronounced in meiosis than during mitotic division. The influence of meiosis on instability is 4.4 times greater when the second YAC with a repeat tract is not present. Most of the changes we observed in trinucleotide repeat tracts are large contractions of 21 to 50 repeats. The orientation of the insert with the repeats has no effect on the frequency and distribution of the contractions. In our experiments, expansions were found almost exclusively during gametogenesis. Genetic analysis of segregating markers among meiotic progeny excluded unequal crossover as the mechanism for instability. These unique patterns have novel implications for possible mechanisms of repeat instability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4153-4158
Number of pages6
JournalMolecular and Cellular Biology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increased instability of human CTG repeat tracts on yeast artificial chromosomes during gametogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this