Abstract
The state and charitable institutions provide in-kind services for distributive purposes. Such services generally benefit recipients but in particular instances may also cause them harm. We discuss the optimal tort regime that should apply when such harm occurs. We show that the optimal level of care applicable to such services is lower than if the same services are provided by ordinary injurers in the general market. We further demonstrate that the social optimum can be induced by a lenient gross-negligence standard, whereas the standard regimes of ordinary negligence and strict liability both lead to inefficient outcomes. These conclusions are robust to variations in the distribution of recipients’ valuations of the service and to possible agency problems in the state or charity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 181-207 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Journal of Legal Studies |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In-kind transfers and the law of torts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver