Improvised herding: Mapping biobehavioral mechanisms that underlie group efficacy during improvised social interaction

David M. Greenberg, Nir Milstein, Avi Gilboa, Shai Cohen, Nir Haimovich, Shahar Siegman, Shay Pinhasi, Ilanit Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Improvisation is a natural occurring phenomenon that is central to social interaction. Yet, improvisation is an understudied area in group processes and intergroup relations. Here we build on theory and research about human herding to study the contributions of improvisation on group efficacy and its biobehavioral underpinnings. We employed a novel multimodal approach and integrative method when observing face-to-face interactions—51 triads (total N = 153) drummed together in spontaneous-free improvisations as a group, while their electrodermal activity was monitored simultaneously with their second-by-second rhythmic coordination on a shared electronic drum machine. Our results show that three hypothesized factors of human herding—physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion—predict a sense of group efficacy in its group members. These findings are some of the first to show herding at three levels (physiological, behavioral, and mental) in a single study and lay a basis for understanding the role of improvisation in social interaction.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14307
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume60
Issue number9
Early online date19 Apr 2023
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords

  • coordinated behavior
  • electrodermal activity
  • emotional contagion
  • group efficacy
  • herding
  • interpersonal synchrony
  • musical improvisation
  • physiological synchrony

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improvised herding: Mapping biobehavioral mechanisms that underlie group efficacy during improvised social interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this