Improving Patient Safety in General Hospitals Using Structured Handoffs: Outcomes From a National Project

Orly Toren, Michal Lipschuetz, Arielle Lehmann, Gil Regev, Dana Arad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Promoting quality and patient safety is one of the health policy pillars of Israel's Ministry of Health. Communication among healthcare professionals is of utmost importance and can be improved using a standardized, well-known handoff tool such as the Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendations (ISBAR). This study aims to present implementation process and participants' satisfaction of a national project that used a standardized tool for team communication. Methods: This national intervention project included process implementation teams from 17 Israeli general hospitals evaluating the ISBAR implementation process for transferring patients from intensive care units to medical/surgical wards. The project, conducted between January 2017 and March 2018, used Fischer's test and logistic regression. The project evaluation was based on the participants' assessment of and satisfaction with the handoff process. Results: Eighty-seven process implementers completed the questionnaire. A statistically significant increase in satisfaction scores in terms of four variables (p < 0.001) was observed following the implementation of the project. Nurses reported higher satisfaction at the end of the process (0.036). Participants who perceived less missing information during handoffs were more satisfied with the process of information flow between wards (84.9%) than those who perceived more missing information (15.6%). Participants who responded that there was no need to improve information flow were more satisfied with the project information flow (95.6%) compared to the group which responded that it was necessary to improve information flow (58.2%). Three out of four variables predicted satisfaction with the process. Being a nurse also predicted satisfaction with information flow with a point estimate of 2.4. The C value of the total model was 0.87. Conclusions: Implementation of a safety project at a national level requires careful planning and the close involvement of the participating teams. A standardized instrument, a well-defined process, and external controls to monitor and manage the project are essential for success. Disparities found in the responses of nurses vs. physicians suggest the need for a different approach for each profession in planning and executing a similar project in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Article number777678
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Mar 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Toren, Lipschuetz, Lehmann, Regev and Arad.

Keywords

  • ISBAR
  • handoffs
  • patient safety
  • patient's transfer
  • standardized tool
  • team communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Patient Safety in General Hospitals Using Structured Handoffs: Outcomes From a National Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this