Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes

Purpose To evaluate the learning curve of senior urogynecologic surgeons performing laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSCP) and to assess outcomes and complications of LSCP. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 47 consecutive women who underwent LSCP for pelvic organ prolapse repair between March 2009 and December 2010 at one tertiary medical center. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and demographic data were retrieved from patients’ electronic charts. Pelvic organ support was assessed objectively using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification scale (POP-Q). Anatomic failure was determined as POP-Q stage ≥ II. Results The mean age of patients was 58 years (range 35–73 years). Seven (15 %) who opted to retain their uterus underwent sacrohysteropexies. The median POP-Q was III (II–IV). Of the 47 operations, 96 % (45) were completed by laparoscopy. The duration of surgery decreased as experience of the surgical team increased, from a mean of 196 ± 62 min for the first 15 cases to 162 ± 30 min for the subsequent 30. Four patients (9 %) presented with recurrence of prolapse; three (7 %) had de novo stress urinary incontinence; two sustained a cystotomy during adhesiolysis, and one had a port-site hernia. Conclusions LSCP is a safe and effective treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, with very few complications. Following the first 15 cases of one surgical team, operative time decreased considerably.