TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Narrative Task Complexity and Language on Macrostructure in Bilingual Kindergarten Children
AU - Lipner, Minna
AU - Armon-Lotem, Sharon
AU - Fichman, Sveta
AU - Walters, Joel
AU - Altman, Carmit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4/11
Y1 - 2024/4/11
N2 - Purpose: We investigated the impact of narrative task complexity on macro-structure in both languages of bilingual kindergarten children and the relation-ship of macrostructure across languages to guide practitioners’ choice of assessment tools and aid in interpretation of results. Method: Thirty-nine English–Hebrew bilingual kindergarten children (Mage = 65 months) retold two narratives in each language: A one-episode story and a three-episode story. Stories were coded for macrostructure using five story gram-mar (SG) elements: Internal State-Initiating Event, Goal, Attempt, Outcome, and Internal State-Reaction. Linear mixed and generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze scores for total macrostructure, episode, and SG elements; correlations were conducted to examine cross-language relations in macrostructure. Results: In general, performance on the single-episode story was significantly better than for the three-episode story: Higher percentages of SG elements were produced, with better performance in the home language/English. In addition to Task and Language effects, Age and Episode (Episodes 1/2/3 of the three-episode story vs. one-episode story) emerged as predictors of macrostructure. Performance on the different episodes of the three-episode story varied, with Episode 3 yielding scores similar to those on the one-episode story. Children produced more Attempts and Outcomes than other SG elements. Finally, the total macrostructure scores yielded low to moderate correlations across languages for both one-episode and three-episode stories, but there were no significant cross-task (one-episode/three-episode story) correlations. Conclusions: The study illustrates the importance of task complexity in narrative performance. Ideally, assessment should include a variety of tools, which would include narratives varying in complexity. However, time constraints do not always permit this luxury. The findings here may offer more to therapists than to diagnosticians. Narratives should be manipulated for episodic complexity not only in the number of episodes but also with regard to characters, goals, feelings, and reactions to events.
AB - Purpose: We investigated the impact of narrative task complexity on macro-structure in both languages of bilingual kindergarten children and the relation-ship of macrostructure across languages to guide practitioners’ choice of assessment tools and aid in interpretation of results. Method: Thirty-nine English–Hebrew bilingual kindergarten children (Mage = 65 months) retold two narratives in each language: A one-episode story and a three-episode story. Stories were coded for macrostructure using five story gram-mar (SG) elements: Internal State-Initiating Event, Goal, Attempt, Outcome, and Internal State-Reaction. Linear mixed and generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze scores for total macrostructure, episode, and SG elements; correlations were conducted to examine cross-language relations in macrostructure. Results: In general, performance on the single-episode story was significantly better than for the three-episode story: Higher percentages of SG elements were produced, with better performance in the home language/English. In addition to Task and Language effects, Age and Episode (Episodes 1/2/3 of the three-episode story vs. one-episode story) emerged as predictors of macrostructure. Performance on the different episodes of the three-episode story varied, with Episode 3 yielding scores similar to those on the one-episode story. Children produced more Attempts and Outcomes than other SG elements. Finally, the total macrostructure scores yielded low to moderate correlations across languages for both one-episode and three-episode stories, but there were no significant cross-task (one-episode/three-episode story) correlations. Conclusions: The study illustrates the importance of task complexity in narrative performance. Ideally, assessment should include a variety of tools, which would include narratives varying in complexity. However, time constraints do not always permit this luxury. The findings here may offer more to therapists than to diagnosticians. Narratives should be manipulated for episodic complexity not only in the number of episodes but also with regard to characters, goals, feelings, and reactions to events.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190482632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2023_lshss-23-00152
DO - 10.1044/2023_lshss-23-00152
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38363723
AN - SCOPUS:85190482632
SN - 0161-1461
VL - 55
SP - 545
EP - 560
JO - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
JF - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
IS - 2
ER -