Imagining in response to fiction: unpacking the infrastructure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Works of fiction are alleged to differ from works of nonfiction in instructing their audience to imagine their content. Indeed, works of fiction have been defined in terms of this feature: they are works that mandate us to imagine their content. This paper examines this definition of works of fiction, focusing on the nature of the activity that ensues in response to reading or watching fiction. Investigating how imaginings function in other contexts, I show, first, that they presuppose a cognitive infrastructure encompassing at least one additional kind of mental state, whose role is to determine, to some degree, truth in an imaginary world. I then discuss the implications for the definition of fiction, showing that the definition should be refined to accommodate the structure that imagining presupposes: a work counts as fiction just in case it mandates us, not only to imagine, but to engage in a more complex mental activity, an activity that in addition to imagining, involves positing a backdrop for our imaginings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-48
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Explorations
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Kendall Walton
  • belief-like imagining
  • fictional worlds
  • imaginary truths
  • imagination
  • works of fiction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imagining in response to fiction: unpacking the infrastructure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this