Abstract
This paper develops Kendall Walton's account of pictorial experience. Walton argues that the key feature of that experience is that it is imaginatively-penetrated experience. I argue that this idea, as put forward by Walton, has various shortcomings. After discussing these limitations, I suggest, on the basis of a more general phenomenon of cognitive penetration, a refinement of Walton's account. I then show how the revised account explains various features of pictorial experience. Specifically, I show that, given the manner in which imaginings influence perceptual experience, Walton can dispense with the thesis that pictorial experience is twofold.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-47 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Southern Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 The University of Memphis.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Imaginatively-Colored Perception: Walton on Pictorial Experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver