Hysteroscopy may be justified after two miscarriages

A. Weiss, E. Shalev, S. Romano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss is traditionally investigated after three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. Although there is a trend to start investigation after two miscarriages, data are not available to date to justify this approach. We sought to compare the frequency of uterine anomalies between women referred to hysteroscopy for repeated miscarriages after two, and three or more, miscarriages respectively. Methods: A retrospective analysis of acquired and congenital uterine anomalies in all patients undergoing hysteroscopy for repeated pregnancy loss at an academic and referral medical centre. Results: Hysteroscopy was performed on 165 women referred for recurrent pregnancy loss: 67 after two and 98 after three or more consecutive miscarriages. The rate of uterine anomalies did not differ significantly and was 32 versus 28% respectively. Conclusions: Hysteroscopy may be justified following two spontaneous pregnancy losses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2628-2631
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume20
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Hysteroscopy
  • Recurrent miscarriage
  • Uterine anomalies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hysteroscopy may be justified after two miscarriages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this