Hypothetical updates, priority and inconsistency in a logic programming language

  • D. Gabbay
  • , L. Giordano
  • , A. Martelli
  • , N. Olivetti

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper we propose a logic programming language which supports hypothetical updates together with integrity constraints. The language allows sequences of updates by sets of atoms and it makes use of a revision mechanism to restore consistency when an update violates some integrity constraint. The revision policy we adopt is based on the simple idea that more recent information is preferred to earlier one. This language can be used to perform several types of defeasible reasoning. We define a goal-directed proof procedure for the language and develope a logical characterization in a modal logic by introducing an abductive semantics.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLogic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning - 3rd International Conference, LPNMR 1995, Proceedings
EditorsV. Wiktor Marek, Miroslaw Truszczynski, Anil Nerode
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages203-216
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9783540594871
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes
Event3rd International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, LPNMR 1995 - Lexington, United States
Duration: 26 Jun 199528 Jun 1995

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume928
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference3rd International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, LPNMR 1995
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityLexington
Period26/06/9528/06/95

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hypothetical updates, priority and inconsistency in a logic programming language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this