How to respond to inappropriate questions in job interviews: Personal and social consequences of truth-telling, deflection and confrontation

Rotem Kahalon, Johannes Ullrich, Julia C. Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Parents, especially mothers, and young women without children, face a subtle threat in job interviews: being asked inappropriate questions about parental status. In three vignette experiments (N = 760), we compared personal (perceived likability and likelihood of being hired) and social consequences (perceived chances that the interviewer will ask the inappropriate question again) of different response strategies. Results suggest that deflection (i.e., responding with another question) is a superior strategy at the personal level, as it increases the perceived chances to be hired in comparison to truth-telling (Study 1) and confrontation (Studies 1–3) without hurting likability (Study 1). Confrontation (i.e., saying that the question is inappropriate) is a superior strategy at the social level, decreasing the perceived probability that the interviewer will keep asking inappropriate questions in comparison to deflection (Studies 2 and 3) and truth-telling (Study 3). No gender differences were apparent. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-1001
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • Job interviews
  • confrontation
  • deflection
  • discrimination
  • inequality
  • negative work behaviours
  • stigmatized identity
  • strategic disclosure
  • work-family interface

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to respond to inappropriate questions in job interviews: Personal and social consequences of truth-telling, deflection and confrontation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this