How Specific is the Shape Bias?

Gil Diesendruck, Paul Bloom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

139 Scopus citations

Abstract

Children tend to extend object names on the basis of sameness of shape, rather than size, color, or material - a tendency that has been dubbed the "shape bias." Is the shape bias the result of well-learned associations between words and objects? Or does it exist because of a general belief that shape is a good indicator of object category membership? The present three studies addressed this debate by exploring whether the shape bias is specific to naming. In Study 1, 3-year-olds showed the shape bias both when asked to extend a novel name and when asked to select an object of the same kind as a target object. Study 2 found the same shape bias when children were asked to generalize properties relevant to category membership. Study 3 replicated the findings from Study 1 with 2-year-olds. These findings suggest that the shape bias derives from children's beliefs about object kinds and is not the product of associative learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-178
Number of pages11
JournalChild Development
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Specific is the Shape Bias?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this