Holocaust education in transition from live to virtual survivor testimony: pedagogical and ethical dilemmas

Alan S. Marcus, Rotem Maor, Ian M. McGregor, Gary Mills, Simone Schweber, Jeremy Stoddard, David Hicks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article explores the pedagogical challenges and ethical dilemmas related to the use of Virtual Interactive Holocaust Survivor Testimony (VIHST) in place of live survivor testimony. The National Holocaust Centre and Museum (UK) uses 3D interactive digital as an attempt to replicate the meaningful learning experiences of listening to a live survivor. Data was collected through interviews with survivors and museum staff. Key findings include how survivors are chosen to participate, whether testimonies can or should be edited for pedagogical purposes, and challenges associated with virtual testimony that do not exist with live survivor testimony.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-301
Number of pages23
JournalHolocaust Studies
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

for this study was provided by a Dean’s Research Incentive Grant from the Neag School of Education at the University of Connecticut. We wish to extend our gratitude to the Holocaust survivors and staff at the National Holocaust Centre who graciously participated in this study and for their exhaustive effort working with pupils.

FundersFunder number
University of Connecticut
Neag School of Education

    Keywords

    • Holocaust
    • Holocaust education
    • museum education
    • testimony
    • virtual interactive Holocaust survivor testimony
    • virtual testimony

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Holocaust education in transition from live to virtual survivor testimony: pedagogical and ethical dilemmas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this