Abstract
In the history of infinitesimal calculus, we trace innovation from Leibniz to Cauchy and reaction from Berkeley to Mansion and beyond. We explore 19th century infinitesimal lores, including the ap¬proaches of Simeon-Denis Poisson, Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis, and Jean-Nicolas Noel. We examine contrasting historiographic approaches to such lores, in the work of Laugwitz, Schubring, Spalt, and others, and address a recent critique by Archibald ct al. We argue that the clement of contingency in this history is more prominent than many modern historians seem willing to acknowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 189-257 |
| Number of pages | 69 |
| Journal | Antiquitates Mathematicae |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022, Polish Mathematical Society. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Infinitesimals
- Leibniz
- cauchy
- contingency
- determinacy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver