TY - JOUR
T1 - High blood pressure response to stress ergometry could predict future hypertension
AU - Farah, Raymond
AU - Shurtz-Swirski, Revital
AU - Nicola, Makhoul
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - Background: Previous studies have shown that exaggerated blood pressure (BP) during exercise is a valid risk predictor for future hypertension in most men and women, yet the use of ergometry as a means of early detection of incipient hypertension still requires confirmation. Objectives: To assess the clinical utility of exercise BP measurement for the evaluation of risk for developing new-onset hypertension. Methods: Thirty individuals with normal BP were enrolled in this study and were subsequently divided into two groups: 13 persons with in-exercise hypertension were compared with 17 matched persons who were normotensive during ergometry. Their blood pressure was monitored during follow-up of two years. Results: More individuals in the exercise-hypertensive group developed hypertension after one or two years than those normotensive during the exercise (respectively, one year: 3 vs.0, p = 0.03, two years: 10 vs. 1, p < 0.0001). Both the systolic and diastolic BPs significantly differed between the two groups. Eighty four percent of those with exaggerated BP (≥ 210 mm Hg) during the treadmill exercise developed hypertension after 2 years. The sensitivity and specificity of in-exercise hypertension for predicting its 2 year occurrence were, respectively, 91% and 84%. Conclusion: Even in the absence of hypertension, its development during stress ergometry could be considered a predictive marker for the future development of hypertension, and can be a potential tool for identifying normotensive individuals at high risk. These individuals should be followed up and their BP controlled for a long time.
AB - Background: Previous studies have shown that exaggerated blood pressure (BP) during exercise is a valid risk predictor for future hypertension in most men and women, yet the use of ergometry as a means of early detection of incipient hypertension still requires confirmation. Objectives: To assess the clinical utility of exercise BP measurement for the evaluation of risk for developing new-onset hypertension. Methods: Thirty individuals with normal BP were enrolled in this study and were subsequently divided into two groups: 13 persons with in-exercise hypertension were compared with 17 matched persons who were normotensive during ergometry. Their blood pressure was monitored during follow-up of two years. Results: More individuals in the exercise-hypertensive group developed hypertension after one or two years than those normotensive during the exercise (respectively, one year: 3 vs.0, p = 0.03, two years: 10 vs. 1, p < 0.0001). Both the systolic and diastolic BPs significantly differed between the two groups. Eighty four percent of those with exaggerated BP (≥ 210 mm Hg) during the treadmill exercise developed hypertension after 2 years. The sensitivity and specificity of in-exercise hypertension for predicting its 2 year occurrence were, respectively, 91% and 84%. Conclusion: Even in the absence of hypertension, its development during stress ergometry could be considered a predictive marker for the future development of hypertension, and can be a potential tool for identifying normotensive individuals at high risk. These individuals should be followed up and their BP controlled for a long time.
KW - Blood pressure
KW - Exaggerated response
KW - Hypertension
KW - Stress ergometry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349089234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.09.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.09.016
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 19524175
AN - SCOPUS:67349089234
SN - 0953-6205
VL - 20
SP - 366
EP - 368
JO - European Journal of Internal Medicine
JF - European Journal of Internal Medicine
IS - 4
ER -