Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub: Theory and Practice

Shlomit Flint Ashery, Rinat Steinlauf-Millo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations


This paper compares the IGC academic approach to geodesign with the Geodesignhub approach, which is closer to the real world of interest groups practitioners. Based on two latest workshops, the paper assesses the degree to which geodesign—as a methodology that combines design and geography, powered by GIS technology that enables measurement of performance—could lend itself well on the bridge between academia and practice. The purpose of the CAMKOX Corridor and Neve-Sha'anan workshops was to think through strategic alternatives for a complex set of intra- and inter-system relationships among policies and projects in a future-oriented spatial–temporal manner, and to do this with considerable openness, flexibility and efficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUrban Book Series
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Number of pages16
StatePublished - 2021

Publication series

NameUrban Book Series
ISSN (Print)2365-757X
ISSN (Electronic)2365-7588

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.


  • Future Scenarios
  • Future strategic alternatives
  • Geodesign
  • Geodesignhub
  • IGC


Dive into the research topics of 'Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub: Theory and Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this