Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub: Theory and Practice

Shlomit Flint Ashery; Rinat Steinlauf-Millo

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_22

Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub: Theory and Practice

Shlomit Flint Ashery, Rinat Steinlauf-Millo

Department of Environment, Planning and Sustainability

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper compares the IGC academic approach to geodesign with the Geodesignhub approach, which is closer to the real world of interest groups practitioners. Based on two latest workshops, the paper assesses the degree to which geodesign—as a methodology that combines design and geography, powered by GIS technology that enables measurement of performance—could lend itself well on the bridge between academia and practice. The purpose of the CAMKOX Corridor and Neve-Sha'anan workshops was to think through strategic alternatives for a complex set of intra- and inter-system relationships among policies and projects in a future-oriented spatial–temporal manner, and to do this with considerable openness, flexibility and efficiency.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Urban Book Series
Publisher	Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Pages	431-446
Number of pages	16
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_22
State	Published - 2021

Publication series

Name	Urban Book Series
ISSN (Print)	2365-757X
ISSN (Electronic)	2365-7588

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Keywords

Future Scenarios
Future strategic alternatives
Geodesign
Geodesignhub
IGC

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_22

Cite this

@inbook{65b255bdfdc748beba3f93755a356c64,

title = "Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub: Theory and Practice",

abstract = "This paper compares the IGC academic approach to geodesign with the Geodesignhub approach, which is closer to the real world of interest groups practitioners. Based on two latest workshops, the paper assesses the degree to which geodesign—as a methodology that combines design and geography, powered by GIS technology that enables measurement of performance—could lend itself well on the bridge between academia and practice. The purpose of the CAMKOX Corridor and Neve-Sha'anan workshops was to think through strategic alternatives for a complex set of intra- and inter-system relationships among policies and projects in a future-oriented spatial–temporal manner, and to do this with considerable openness, flexibility and efficiency.",

keywords = "Future Scenarios, Future strategic alternatives, Geodesign, Geodesignhub, IGC",

author = "{Flint Ashery}, Shlomit and Rinat Steinlauf-Millo",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_22",

language = "אנגלית",

series = "Urban Book Series",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

pages = "431--446",

booktitle = "Urban Book Series",

address = "גרמניה",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub

T2 - Theory and Practice

AU - Flint Ashery, Shlomit

AU - Steinlauf-Millo, Rinat

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This paper compares the IGC academic approach to geodesign with the Geodesignhub approach, which is closer to the real world of interest groups practitioners. Based on two latest workshops, the paper assesses the degree to which geodesign—as a methodology that combines design and geography, powered by GIS technology that enables measurement of performance—could lend itself well on the bridge between academia and practice. The purpose of the CAMKOX Corridor and Neve-Sha'anan workshops was to think through strategic alternatives for a complex set of intra- and inter-system relationships among policies and projects in a future-oriented spatial–temporal manner, and to do this with considerable openness, flexibility and efficiency.

AB - This paper compares the IGC academic approach to geodesign with the Geodesignhub approach, which is closer to the real world of interest groups practitioners. Based on two latest workshops, the paper assesses the degree to which geodesign—as a methodology that combines design and geography, powered by GIS technology that enables measurement of performance—could lend itself well on the bridge between academia and practice. The purpose of the CAMKOX Corridor and Neve-Sha'anan workshops was to think through strategic alternatives for a complex set of intra- and inter-system relationships among policies and projects in a future-oriented spatial–temporal manner, and to do this with considerable openness, flexibility and efficiency.

KW - Future Scenarios

KW - Future strategic alternatives

KW - Geodesign

KW - Geodesignhub

KW - IGC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111913902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_22

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_22

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???

AN - SCOPUS:85111913902

T3 - Urban Book Series

SP - 431

EP - 446

BT - Urban Book Series

PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH

ER -

Geodesign Between IGC and Geodesignhub: Theory and Practice

Abstract

Publication series

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this