Abstract
In recent years, considerable progress has been made in frontline therapy for elderly/physically unfit patients with CLL. The combination of obinutuzumab and chlorambucil (O-Clb) has been shown to prolong progression free survival (PFS, median PFS-31.5 months) and overall survival (OS) compared to chlorambucil alone. More recently, obinutuzumab given in combination with either ibrutinib or venetoclax improved PFS but not OS when compared to O-Clb. In this retrospective multinational, multicenter co-operative study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of frontline treatment with O ± Clb in unfit patients with CLL, in a “real-world” setting. Patients with documented del (17p13.1)/TP53 mutation were excluded. A total of 437 patients (median age, 75.9 years; median CIRS score, 8; median creatinine clearance, 61.1 mL/min) were included. The clinical overall response rate was 80.3% (clinical complete and partial responses in 38.7% and 41.6% of patients, respectively). Median observation time was 14.1 months and estimated median PFS was 27.6 months (95% CI, 24.2-31.0). In a multivariate analysis, high-risk disease [del (11q22.3) and/or IGHV-unmutated], lymph nodes of diameter > 5 cm, obinutuzumab monotherapy and reduced cumulative dose of obinutuzumab, were all independently associated with shorter PFS. The median OS has not yet been reached and estimated 2-year OS is 88%. In conclusion, in a “real-world” setting, frontline treatment with O-Clb achieves PFS comparable to that reported in clinical trials. Inferior outcomes were noted in patients with del (11q22.3) and/or unmutated IGHV and those treated with obinutuzumab-monotherapy. Thus, O-Clb can be still considered as legitimate frontline therapy for unfit CLL patients with low-risk disease.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 604-611 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | American Journal of Hematology |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jun 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Funding
YH‐ has reported honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Astra‐Zeneca and Roche. MD has reported honoraria and research grants from Roche, AbbVie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Novartis and Jannsen. JL‐AdBoards/honoraria: Janssen, Abbvie. AdBoard: AstraZeneca. Honoraria: Roche, Gilead. RGM‐ has reported grants: Gilead, Janssen. Research support: Gilead and honoraria: Gilead, Abbvie. PG has reported Honoraria/advisory board: AbbVie, Acerta/AstraZeneca, Adaptive, ArQule, BeiGene, CelGene/Juno, Dynamo, Gilead, Janssen, Sunesis. Research Funding: AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Roche | |
Gilead Sciences | |
AbbVie |