Abstract
Developing argumentation-based persuasive agents that leverage human argumentative techniques is an open challenge in the computational argumentation field. In this paper, we propose a computational perspective on the psychological techniques people tend to follow during persuasion interactions drawing on psychological evidence. We focus on four well-established psychological techniques, model and investigate them using a recently proposed argumentative computational framework. Our investigation reveals both similarities and gaps between the two which can be either leveraged or addressed in the design of argumentation-based persuasive agents and future theoretical developments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 16-21 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| State | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 2018 Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, AISB 2018 - Liverpool, United Kingdom Duration: 4 Apr 2018 → 6 Apr 2018 |
Conference
| Conference | 2018 Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, AISB 2018 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Liverpool |
| Period | 4/04/18 → 6/04/18 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Proceedings of AISB Annual Convention 2018. All rights reserved.
Funding
This research is part funded by EPSRC Project EP/N008294/1 (Framework for Computational Persuasion).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council | EP/N008294/1 |