| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-122 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Language and Communication |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1992 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:’ We acknowledge with gratitude the support of this research by the Israel National Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Fund for Basic Research, and by the lsracl Ford foundation-Educational Trustees. Among those whose comments and encouragement have benefited this work, we would like to thank Barbara Kirshenbfatt-Gimblett. Jeffrey Kittay. Michael M. Sheehan. Tamar Katriel. Shoshana Blum-Kulka, and Esther Cohen. Special thanks to our research-assistant. Eugene Sotirescu. for his help with Old English. This paper is a revised and expanded version of Danet and Bogoch (in press). ’ Whether and in what ways literacy may be reversible are issues for debate. Nowadays. the clcctronic media are contributing to a realignment of interrelations between oratity and literacy once again. They arc transforming comn~unication beliefs and practices in ways we hardly begin to grasp.