TY - JOUR
T1 - From Epistemic Modality to Deontic Modality: Evidence from Hebrew
T2 - Evidence from Hebrew
AU - Livnat, Z.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Modality is a semantic domain which" covers a broad ränge of semantic nuances: jussive, desiderative, intentive, hypothetical, potential, obligative, dubitative, hortatory, exclamative, etc."(Bybee-Fleischman 1995: 2). Influenced by modal logic, many linguists describing modality in natural language use a distinction between'deontic'and'epistemic'modality. Epistemic modality has to do with the possibility or necessity of the truth of propositions, and is thus involved with knowledge and belief (Lyons 1977: 793). Deontic (or'root') modality, ...
AB - Modality is a semantic domain which" covers a broad ränge of semantic nuances: jussive, desiderative, intentive, hypothetical, potential, obligative, dubitative, hortatory, exclamative, etc."(Bybee-Fleischman 1995: 2). Influenced by modal logic, many linguists describing modality in natural language use a distinction between'deontic'and'epistemic'modality. Epistemic modality has to do with the possibility or necessity of the truth of propositions, and is thus involved with knowledge and belief (Lyons 1977: 793). Deontic (or'root') modality, ...
UR - http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/flih.2002.23.issue-1-2/flih.2002.23.1-2.107/flih.2002.23.1-2.107.xml
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29044445281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
SN - 0168-647X
VL - 23
SP - 107
EP - 114
JO - Folia Linguistica Historica
JF - Folia Linguistica Historica
IS - 1-2
ER -