Français en contexte universitaire : une apologie du bon français pour se permettre ”l'à peu près”

Translated title of the contribution: French in an Academic Environment – An Apologia for Good Standard French in Order to Tolerate Non-Standard Informal French : “L’À PEU PRÈS”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since the implementation of the CEFRL and the creation of the now popular DELF (Diplôme d’études en langue française), one realizes that the standard of knowledge and skills is expected by the educational authorities for the basic levels is lower and more superficial than before. According to the new learning methods focusing on the aims of the CEFRL, French must be, above all, an everyday communicative tool and it often doesn’t matter how one understands or makes oneself understood as long as one understands and is understood. This is a non-standard and substandard type of discourse that could be defined as “à peu près”. This situation becomes especially problematic in countries where French is less widespread than in Western Europe and even more when it comes to learning French in an academic environment. In these countries, the result of these reforms seems to be having a negative impact on the linguistic performance of French learners and the new state of affairs requires consideration and a revision of both the objectives and the teaching methods
Translated title of the contributionFrench in an Academic Environment – An Apologia for Good Standard French in Order to Tolerate Non-Standard Informal French : “L’À PEU PRÈS”
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)102-111
JournalRevue internationale MÉTHODAL Méthodologie de l'enseignement/apprentissage des langues
Volume2017
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Academic context - CEFRL - DELF - FFL methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'French in an Academic Environment – An Apologia for Good Standard French in Order to Tolerate Non-Standard Informal French : “L’À PEU PRÈS”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this