FOLFOX alone or combined with rilotumumab or panitumumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (PRODIGE 17-ACCORD 20-MEGA): a randomised, open-label, three-arm phase II trial

David Malka, Eric François, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Florence Castan, Olivier Bouché, Jaafar Bennouna, François Ghiringhelli, Christelle de la Fouchardière, Christophe Borg, Emmanuelle Samalin, Jean Baptiste Bachet, Jean Luc Raoul, Laurent Miglianico, Leila Bengrine-Lefèvre, Laetitia Dahan, Cédric Lecaille, Thomas Aparicio, Trevor Stanbury, Hervé Perrier, Anne CayrePierre Laurent-Puig, Sophie Gourgou, Jean François Emile, Julien Taïeb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) pathways, which promote tumour growth and proliferation, are often deregulated in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. We assessed whether adding panitumumab (an EGFR inhibitor) or rilotumumab (a HGF inhibitor) to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy (modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) benefits to patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients and methods: This phase II, open-label, randomised, three-arm study enrolled patients ≥18 years, with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 and no known HER2 overexpression. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus then 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h) alone or combined with panitumumab (6 mg/kg) or rilotumumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until limiting toxicity, patient's refusal or disease progression. The primary end-point was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS) and tolerance. Results: The study enrolled 162 patients in 29 French centres. The median follow-up was 23.6 months (interquartile range = 16.4–29.0). The 4-month PFS rate was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 57–82) with chemotherapy alone, 57% (95% CI = 42–71) combined with panitumumab and 61% (95% CI = 47–74) combined with rilotumumab. Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI = 8.7–16.9) with chemotherapy alone, 8.3 months (95% CI = 6.2–13.2) combined with panitumumab and 11.5 months (95% CI = 7.9–17.1) combined with rilotumumab. Adverse events grade ≥III occurred less frequently with chemotherapy alone (62%) than with panitumumab (83%) and rilotumumab (89%). Conclusions: We found no benefit in adding panitumumab or rilotumumab to mFOLFOX6 first-line chemotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Trial registration: European Clinical Trials Database, number 2009-012797-12.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume115
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

Dr. Miglianico reports personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre Oncologie and Roche, outside the submitted work. The authors thank all participating patients and staff at study sites. This study was granted by Amgen and supported by UNICANCER, who provided study management assistance. Corinne De Backer (Lincoln) provided medical writing services on behalf of UNICANCER.

FundersFunder number
Amgen
Pfizer
Novartis
Unicancer

    Keywords

    • Advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
    • First-line treatment
    • Panitumumab
    • Rilotumumab
    • mFOLFOX6

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'FOLFOX alone or combined with rilotumumab or panitumumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (PRODIGE 17-ACCORD 20-MEGA): a randomised, open-label, three-arm phase II trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this