Focal randomisation: An optimal mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

In most countries, governments intervene in the process of R&D by financing a substantial part of it. The mechanism employed for choosing the projects to be financed is a committee composed of experts who evaluate projects in their field of specialisation, and decide which ones should be funded. This method is conservative. Proposals for new ideas are too often rejected, and inventions are commonly thrown out of the set of potential projects. In this paper, I propose a mechanism that will allow less conformity: focal randomisation. This states that projects that are unanimously ranked at the top by all reviewers will be adopted. Projects perceived as valueless by all are rejected, while projects that are ranked differently are randomised. I compare the average return under the present and proposed mechanisms. I examine under which conditions this new method is preferable, and its consequences on economic growth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-698
Number of pages8
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume34
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Focal randomisation: An optimal mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this