Fluoroless Ureteroscopy: Experience in More Than 100 Patients

Muhamad Abu Ahmed, Wasiem Abu Nasra, Ali Safadi, Alexander Visoky, Ibrahim Elias, Ran Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Ureteroscopy is becoming the primary treatment for ureteral stones. As a standard of care, ureteroscopy is performed under the supervision of fluoroscopy. Recent advances in endourological technology make the need for fluoroscopy questionable. Objectives: To summarize our experience with a no-fluorosco-py technique for selected cases of ureteral stones. Methods: Patients were considered suitable for fluoroless ureteroscopy if they had one or two non-impacted stones, in any location in the ureter, 5-10 mm size, with a normal contralateral renal unit and no urinary tract infection. Procedures were performed using rigid scopes, nitinol baskets/forceps for stone retrieval, and Holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. Stents were placed per surgeon's decision. Results: During an 18-month period, 103 patients underwent fluoroless ureteroscopy. In 94 patients stones were removed successfully. In six, the stones were pushed to the kidney and treated successfully on a separate session by shock wave lithotripsy. In three patients no stone was found in the ureter. In five patients, miniature perforations in the ureter were noted and an indwelling double J stent was placed. Conclusions: Fluoroless ureteroscopy resulted in a high rate of success. We believe that in selected cases it can be used with minimal adverse events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-51
Number of pages5
JournalIsrael Medical Association Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Israel Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • fluoroscopy
  • irradiation exposure
  • lithotripsy
  • ureterolithiasis
  • ureteroscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fluoroless Ureteroscopy: Experience in More Than 100 Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this