TY - JOUR
T1 - Flow cytometry aneuploidy and cell cycle indexing as a possible tool for differentiating between CD10+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma
AU - Azoulay, David
AU - Cohen, Hector I.
AU - Dementiev, Eugene
AU - Eshel, Elizabeth
AU - Akria, Luiza
AU - Shaoul, Ety
AU - Horowitz, Netanel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Background: Differential diagnosis between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) becomes a challenge when adequate biopsy is unavailable. The present study aimed to investigate the applicability of DNA cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry (FC) for differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL. Methods: Data were collected from 57 specimens where CD5−/CD10+/light chain restricted B cells were detected. DNA staining was performed using the Coulter DNA Prep Kit. Cell cycle fractions were evaluated by automatic analysis using the ModFit LT software. Results: Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of CD10+ FL in 30 specimens (52.6%), CD10+ DLBCL in 24 specimens (42.1%), and CD10+ Burkitt lymphoma in 3 specimens (5.3%). A significantly higher rate of DNA aneuploidy was detected among CD10+ DLBCL than FL specimens (50 vs. 13.3% respectively, p =.003). Likewise, DNA index was significantly higher in CD10+ DLBCL relative to FL (1.26 ± 0.35 vs. 1.04 ± 0.16 respectively, p =.004). Notably, the proportion of cells in the S-phase and proliferative fraction was significantly higher in CD10+ DLBCL than in CD10+ FL (S-phase: 15.97 ± 13.94 vs. 4.43 ± 4.41 mean ± SD, respectively, p '.0001; proliferative fraction: 18.87 ± 15.17 vs. 5.78 ± 7.04 mean ± SD, respectively, p =.0001). Using a receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimal cutoffs for S-phase ≥7% and proliferative fraction ≥9% were determined. These values could be used to differentiate between CD10+ DLBCL and CD10+ FL. Conclusion: Including DNA cell cycle analysis in the FC lymphoma assessment panel may be of diagnostic value in differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL when adequate biopsy is unavailable.
AB - Background: Differential diagnosis between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) becomes a challenge when adequate biopsy is unavailable. The present study aimed to investigate the applicability of DNA cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry (FC) for differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL. Methods: Data were collected from 57 specimens where CD5−/CD10+/light chain restricted B cells were detected. DNA staining was performed using the Coulter DNA Prep Kit. Cell cycle fractions were evaluated by automatic analysis using the ModFit LT software. Results: Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of CD10+ FL in 30 specimens (52.6%), CD10+ DLBCL in 24 specimens (42.1%), and CD10+ Burkitt lymphoma in 3 specimens (5.3%). A significantly higher rate of DNA aneuploidy was detected among CD10+ DLBCL than FL specimens (50 vs. 13.3% respectively, p =.003). Likewise, DNA index was significantly higher in CD10+ DLBCL relative to FL (1.26 ± 0.35 vs. 1.04 ± 0.16 respectively, p =.004). Notably, the proportion of cells in the S-phase and proliferative fraction was significantly higher in CD10+ DLBCL than in CD10+ FL (S-phase: 15.97 ± 13.94 vs. 4.43 ± 4.41 mean ± SD, respectively, p '.0001; proliferative fraction: 18.87 ± 15.17 vs. 5.78 ± 7.04 mean ± SD, respectively, p =.0001). Using a receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimal cutoffs for S-phase ≥7% and proliferative fraction ≥9% were determined. These values could be used to differentiate between CD10+ DLBCL and CD10+ FL. Conclusion: Including DNA cell cycle analysis in the FC lymphoma assessment panel may be of diagnostic value in differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL when adequate biopsy is unavailable.
KW - DLBCL
KW - DNA aneuploidy
KW - FL
KW - GM
KW - S-phase
KW - proliferative fraction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076350839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.b.21861
DO - 10.1002/cyto.b.21861
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 31816181
AN - SCOPUS:85076350839
SN - 1552-4949
VL - 98
SP - 449
EP - 453
JO - Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
JF - Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
IS - 5
ER -