Fixel-based Analysis of Diffusion MRI: Methods, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities

  • Thijs Dhollander
  • , Adam Clemente
  • , Mervyn Singh
  • , Frederique Boonstra
  • , Oren Civier
  • , Juan Dominguez Duque
  • , Natalia Egorova
  • , Peter Enticott
  • , Ian Fuelscher
  • , Sanuji Gajamange
  • , Sila Genc
  • , Elie Gottlieb
  • , Christian Hyde
  • , Phoebe Imms
  • , Claire Kelly
  • , Melissa Kirkovski
  • , Scott Kolbe
  • , Xiaoyun Liang
  • , Atul Malhotra
  • , Remika Mito
  • Govinda Poudel, Tim J. Silk, David N. Vaughan, Julien Zanin, David Raffelt, Karen Caeyenberghs

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

201 Scopus citations

Abstract

Diffusion MRI has provided the neuroimaging community with a powerful tool to acquire in-vivo data sensitive to microstructural features of white matter, up to 3 orders of magnitude smaller than typical voxel sizes. The key to extracting such valuable information lies in complex modelling techniques, which form the link between the rich diffusion MRI data and various metrics related to the microstructural organization. Over time, increasingly advanced techniques have been developed, up to the point where some diffusion MRI models can now provide access to properties specific to individual fibre populations in each voxel in the presence of multiple “crossing” fibre pathways. While highly valuable, such fibre-specific information poses unique challenges for typical image processing pipelines and statistical analysis. In this work, we review the “Fixel-Based Analysis” (FBA) framework, which implements bespoke solutions to this end. It has recently seen a stark increase in adoption for studies of both typical (healthy) populations as well as a wide range of clinical populations. We describe the main concepts related to Fixel-Based Analyses, as well as the methods and specific steps involved in a state-of-the-art FBA pipeline, with a focus on providing researchers with practical advice on how to interpret results. We also include an overview of the scope of all current FBA studies, categorized across a broad range of neuro-scientific domains, listing key design choices and summarizing their main results and conclusions. Finally, we critically discuss several aspects and challenges involved with the FBA framework, and outline some directions and future opportunities.

Original languageEnglish
Article number118417
JournalNeuroImage
Volume241
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Funding

TD, SiG, CK, XL and TS acknowledge the support of the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation, Department of Paediatrics at The University of Melbourne and the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program. OC acknowledges the facilities and scientific and technical assistance of the National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at Swinburne Neuroimaging, Swinburne University of Technology. NE is supported by the Discovery Early Career Researcher Award Fellowship from the Australian Research Council (DE180100893). PE is supported by a Future Fellowship from the Australian Research Council (FT160100077). XL and GP are funded by an Australian Catholic University Research Funding (ACURF) Program Grant. RM and DV acknowledge the facilities and scientific and technical assistance of the National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health. KC is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship (APP1143816). We thank Honey Baseri for assistance with the compilation of reference lists, and John Engel and Laura Dal Pozzo for help with figure construction. TD, SiG, CK, XL and TS acknowledge the support of the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation, Department of Paediatrics at The University of Melbourne and the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program. OC acknowledges the facilities and scientific and technical assistance of the National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at Swinburne Neuroimaging, Swinburne University of Technology. NE is supported by the Discovery Early Career Researcher Award Fellowship from the Australian Research Council (DE180100893). PE is supported by a Future Fellowship from the Australian Research Council (FT160100077). XL and GP are funded by an Australian Catholic University Research Funding (ACURF) Program Grant. RM and DV acknowledge the facilities and scientific and technical assistance of the National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health. KC is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship (APP1143816). We thank Honey Baseri for assistance with the compilation of reference lists, and John Engel and Laura Dal Pozzo for help with figure construction.

FundersFunder number
Department of Paediatrics at The University of Melbourne
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
Australian Research CouncilDE180100893, FT160100077
National Health and Medical Research CouncilAPP1143816
Australian Catholic University
Swinburne University of Technology
State Government of Victoria

    Keywords

    • Diffusion MRI
    • Fibre density
    • Fibre-bundle cross-section
    • Fixel
    • Fixel-Based Analysis
    • Microstructure
    • Statistical analysis
    • White matter

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fixel-based Analysis of Diffusion MRI: Methods, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this