First and second best voting rules in committees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


A committee of people with common preferences but different abilities in identifying the best alternative (e.g., a jury) votes in order to decide between two alternatives. The first best voting rule is a weighted voting rule that takes the different individual competences into account, and is therefore not anonymous, i.e., the voters' identities matter. Under this rule, it is rational for the committee members to vote according to their true opinions, or informatively. This is not necessarily true for an anonymous voting rule, under which members may have an incentive to vote non-informatively. Thus, strategic, sophisticated voters may vary their voting strategies according to the voting rule rather than naively voting informatively. This paper shows that the identity of the best anonymous and monotone (i.e., quota) voting rule does not depend on whether the committee members are strategic or naive or whether some are strategic and some are naive. One such rule, called the second best rule, affords the highest expected utility in all cases. "Wasn't he sweet?" said Yossarian. "Maybe they should give him three votes." Joseph Heller, Catch-22

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-486
Number of pages34
JournalSocial Choice and Welfare
Issue number3
StatePublished - Oct 2007


Dive into the research topics of 'First and second best voting rules in committees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this