Fictional reality or real fiction: How can one decide?: The strengths and weaknesses of information science concepts and methods in the media world

Shifra Baruchson-Arbib, Monique Jucquois-Delpierre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine information and communication science, knowledge and power in relation to a TV “docu-fiction”. In particular, it will look at the decision-making processes of individuals and groups. Designomethodologyoapproach Core information behaviour such as selection and evaluation are examined. Findings Some concepts from the fields of information or communication studies are critically examined, e.g. “gatekeeper” or “classification” and re-analysed in a TV and multi-channel broadcasting environment. Practical implications Positive conclusions show the possible impact of expanding information culture, competence and selection skills, whereby attention is paid to the ethical consequences of information mise en scene. Originalityovalue The obvious, popular and close example of the RTBF “docu-fiction” can be a model to re-think and reflect many information programmes and narratives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-252
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health services
  • Tajikistan
  • Transition management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fictional reality or real fiction: How can one decide?: The strengths and weaknesses of information science concepts and methods in the media world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this