TY - JOUR
T1 - Fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial cancer
T2 - A review of the literature
AU - Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti
AU - Khamisy-Farah, Rola
AU - Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
AU - Bogani, Giorgio
AU - Martinelli, Fabio
AU - Lopez, Salvatore
AU - Chiappa, Valentina
AU - Signorelli, Mauro
AU - Ditto, Antonino
AU - Raspagliesi, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/10/19
Y1 - 2021/10/19
N2 - Endometrial cancer (EC) is currently the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although it is more common in postmenopausal women, it may affect up to 25% in the premenopausal age and 3–5% under the age of 40 years. Furthermore, in the last decades a significant shift to pregnancy at older maternal ages, particularly in resource-rich countries, has been observed. Therefore, in this scenario fertility-sparing alternatives should be discussed with patients affected by EC. This study summarizes available literature on fertility-sparing management of patients affected by EC, focusing on the oncologic and reproductive outcomes. A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in two electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) in order to identify relevant articles to be included for the purpose of this systematic review. On the basis of available evidence, fertility-sparing alternatives are oral progestins alone or in combination with other drugs, levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hysteroscopic resection in association with progestin therapies. These strategies seem feasible and safe for young patients with G1 endometrioid EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of fertility-sparing treatments and future well-designed studies are required.
AB - Endometrial cancer (EC) is currently the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although it is more common in postmenopausal women, it may affect up to 25% in the premenopausal age and 3–5% under the age of 40 years. Furthermore, in the last decades a significant shift to pregnancy at older maternal ages, particularly in resource-rich countries, has been observed. Therefore, in this scenario fertility-sparing alternatives should be discussed with patients affected by EC. This study summarizes available literature on fertility-sparing management of patients affected by EC, focusing on the oncologic and reproductive outcomes. A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in two electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) in order to identify relevant articles to be included for the purpose of this systematic review. On the basis of available evidence, fertility-sparing alternatives are oral progestins alone or in combination with other drugs, levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hysteroscopic resection in association with progestin therapies. These strategies seem feasible and safe for young patients with G1 endometrioid EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of fertility-sparing treatments and future well-designed studies are required.
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Fertility-sparing
KW - Hysteroscopy
KW - Metformin
KW - Progestin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117250178&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm10204784
DO - 10.3390/jcm10204784
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 34682906
AN - SCOPUS:85117250178
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 20
M1 - 4784
ER -